Gaeul Jang vs Heerae Im Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 30 May at 04:24 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
G. Jang vs H. Im

KOR
1
Win
Played
0
Win

KOR
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Jang 1 - 0 Im
They have played 2 sets in total, with Gaeul Jang winning 2 and Heerae Im winning 0. The last match between Gaeul Jang and Heerae Im was at the W15 Daegu, 30-05-2025, Round: QF, Surface: Hard, with Gaeul Jang getting the victory 7-5 6-4.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Jang | 1 |
| Im | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(QF) W15 Daegu(05-30-25)
G. Jang vs H. Im H2H Profile
G. Jang vs H. Im Match Preview:
- Second Serve Performance: Im succeeds on 40.65% of second serve points, slightly trailing Jang's 41.04%.
- Return Game Form: Im excels with a 53.72% win rate on opponents' second serves, compared to Jang's 51.54%.
- First Serve Return Stats: Im outperforms Jang, winning 43.3% of first serve returns against Jang's 36.6%.
- Handling Pressure: Under pressure, Jang saves 46.39% of breakpoints versus Im's 42.86%.
- Match Performance: In the past year, Im has a 62.5% win rate (10 wins, 6 losses), while Jang's is 48.84% (21 wins, 22 losses).
- Best Playing Surface: Both players excel on hard courts, with Im slightly better at a 53% win rate, only a 1% lead over Jang.
- Tournament Level: Im shows greater success (72.73%) in lower-tier tournaments compared to Jang's 53.57% win frequency.
- Opponent Quality: Im's opponents average a rank of 190.88, a tougher competition than Jang's average opponent rank of 479.35.
- Deciding Set Success: Im holds a 67% win rate in deciding sets over the past year, overshadowing Jang's 46% success rate in similar situations.
- Break Point Conversion: Im converts break points at 46.94%, a slight edge over Jang's 43.18% rate.
Editorial Prediction (May 30, 2025, UTC):
Comparing the players' recent performances, key statistical insights offer a glimpse into who might lead the upcoming match. Im demonstrates a slight upper hand in second-serve return performance and first-serve return capabilities, both critical in securing points against formidable opponents.
While both show proficiency on hard courts, Im’s overall win rate and ability to succeed in decisive set scenarios underscore his competitive edge. Additionally, Im's encounters with higher-ranked opponents could indicate a readiness to handle potentially tougher match pressure.
Despite Jang's commendable translation of breakpoints under pressure and reasonable win rate in the same tournament tier, Im’s superior recent match outcomes and exposure to stronger competition suggest he might edge out Jang.
Based on these analyses, Im appears to be the more likely victor in this tennis clash.
Gaeul Jang vs Heerae Im Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
G. Jang vs H. Im H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 13 | Games Won | 9 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
| 1:48:40 | Average Match Time | 1:48:40 |
| 70% (47/67) | 1st Serve % | 66% (44/67) |
| 60% (28/47) | 1st Serve Win % | 59% (26/44) |
| 55% (11/20) | 2nd Serve Win % | 43% (10/23) |
| 56% (5/9) | Break Pts Won % | 75% (3/4) |
| 46% (31/67) | Return Points Win % | 42% (28/67) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
G. Jang Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | L | 6-4 6-0 | ||
R1 | L | 6-4 5-7 6-2 | ||
R2 | L | 6-0 6-2 | ||
R1 | W | 6-4 6-2 | ||
Q1 | L | 7-5 6-4 | ||
H. Im Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Q2 | L | 6-0 6-0 | ||
Q3 | L | 1-6 6-3 10-7 | ||
Q1 | W | 6-1 6-3 | ||
Q1 | L | 1-6 6-3 10-2 | ||
Q3 | L | 6-0 7-6(4) | ||

G. Jang vs H. Im Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 48.89% (44/46) | YTD Win/Loss | 52.44% (43/39) |
| 49.52% (103/105) | Sets Win/Loss | 52.43% (97/88) |
| 50.26% (956/946) | Games Win/Loss | 50.85% (870/841) |
| 50.00% (44/44) | Hard Win/Loss | 51.35% (38/36) |
| 0.00% (0/2) | Indoor Hard W/L | 62.50% (5/3) |
| 0.16 | Aces Per Game | 0.03 |
| 144 | Aces Total | 26 |
| 0.28 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.11 |
| 263 | Total Double Faults | 93 |
| 1:34:5 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 430.92 | Average Opponent Rank | 262.45 |
| 58% (3232/5538) | 1st Serve % | 63% (775/1234) |
| 61% (1956/3232) | 1st Serve Win % | 54% (422/775) |
| 43% (996/2306) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (205/459) |
| 47% (340/728) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 50% (89/179) |
| 46% (2628/5653) | Return Points Win % | 49% (605/1234) |
| 0.00% (0/2) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 48.39% (15/16) | Challenger W/L | 55.56% (15/12) |
| 50.88% (29/28) | Futures W/L | 50.91% (28/27) |
| 48% (43/89) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 53% (42/80) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 36% (4/11) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 50% (4/8) |
| 41% (11/27) | Deciding Set Win % | 48% (11/23) |
| 81% (43/35) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 78% (50/39) |
| 19% (43/8) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 22% (50/11) |
| 17% (47/8) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 9% (32/3) |